|
THE HOLY ROOT
In Romans 11:16 Paul said: "... if the root be holy, so are the branches." What
is he speaking of? The context will show that he is discussing how man, Jew or
gentile, is made holy before God. Because of some things Paul has said, some might
conclude that God had just discarded the Jew (11:1). No - he says in the next
verse this is not the case. Another outgrowth of what he has said was the danger
of the gentile being high minded, thinking that God had cast aside the Jew only
to make room for him. No - that is not the case either.
Beginning in verse 17, Paul starts to speak of two trees. One he refers to as
the "wild olive tree" (v. 17), and the other the "natural tree" (v. 21). Trees
have two things to be considered - they have branches and they have roots. Upon what basis could the gentile be acceptable to God? He must stand "by faith"
(v. 20). Upon what basis was the Jew cast off? In that he was in a state of unbelief
(ibid.). But what was the "root" of which Paul speaks? Roots go to the beginning
of a thing. The root of which he speaks here is God's promise to Abraham that
he would make of him and his seed a great nation (Gen. 12:1ff), and that in him
all nations would be blessed. So at the "root" of the Jewish tree" was God's promise
to Abraham. But this root involved more than only the Jew. It had universal implications;
men of "all nations" (Isa. 2:2-3) would be a part of God's spiritual kingdom under
Christ.
There was no such "root" at the base of the gentile tree; God never made promises
to the gentile as nastions as he did to Abraham. The Jew also became high minded
because he thought he was a special person just because he was of Abraham's seed.
"No," says Paul, "that is not the case." What made the Jew a child of God under
the New Covenant was not his Abrahamic descent, but his faith in Christ, the ultimate
seed of Abraham. Conversely, one's gentile ancestry did not preclude him from
being a child of God, for the promise to Abraham involved all men. Yet Paul warns
the gentile that since God did not spare the "natural branch" (Jews) because of
their unbelief, he would not spare them either should they abid ein unbelief (v.
21).
He shows that if the gentiles, who were of the "wild olive tree" could be grafted
into the "natural tree" because of their faith, so could the Jews, for "God is
able to graft them in again" (v. 23).
Next, Paul calls upon them to consider the "goodness and severity of God" (v.
22). The severity was directed toward those who fell; i.e. the unbeliving Jews.
On the other hand, God's goodness was demonstrated toward the gentiles because
they "continue in his goodness;" i.e. those who remain faithful. Should they fail
in that, they too would be cast off. But it would not be because they were gentiles,
but because of their unbelief.
In verse 26 Paul says, "and so all Israe shall be saved ..." Some have concluded
from this a universal salvation of all Jews. No, for stress must be laid upon
the adverb of manner, "so." How were the gentiles saved? By faith. And so verse 26 is merely saying that just
as the gentiles were saved by faith, "so" would the Jews be. Yet this is not speaking
of every Jew on the face of the earth any more than it is speaking of every gentile
in the world.
God's plan for the salvation of all men is to be found squarely at the root of
the Abrahamic tree. But only as Christ came through the lineal descent of Abraham;
only as his gospel was preached to "every creature" (Jew or gentile), would all
men be saved. Nationality is not a criteria for the salvation of the soul. If
one would be holy, he must partake of the tree with the holy root - God's great
promise to Abraham which was fulfilled in Christ who was born 2,000 years after
the promise was made. - Bill Moseley
AND ANOTHER THING ...
(Avoiding The Test)
The year was 1950, a famous year in history because that was my Junior year in
High School. The event was an upcoming English exam (they taught English back
then), and it was something that neither I nor a buddy of mine were ready for.
Now you might think the best thing to do would be to get ready for the ttest;
you know - a thing called study? But we concocted what seemed at the time a better way to deal with the situation.
Sounded so good at the time, because it was an exceedingly simple plan - we merely
caught the teacher away from her desk, found the exam in a drawer and made a contribution
to the trash can sitting in the hall with it! And then there we sast - grinning
from ear to ear as she searched in vain for it. We just knew we had rescued ourselves
and fellow students from the dreaded exam! From a perspective over 50 years later
what seemed to be so smart then sure looks dumb now!
But - alas! Two or three days later she came up with another one (for which we
were still not ready). We were really bright about it, for surely she would not
go to all the trouble to write another exam! The point? Don't we try to pull this
sort of dumb stunt with God? Just "do away" with his word in our lives when it
gets in our way, and think that God will forget all about it. But - God's "exam"
will be there in the final dayl staring us squarely in the face at the judgment.
And do you know what? Regardless of what we do with God's exam, he won't even
have to write another one. - Bill Moseley |