|
GOD AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
One of the prominent movements today is the "animal rights" activists and their
verbal and actual shenanigans. Let me say first, that I am not an animal lover;
but neither do I think they should be mistreated. Most folks who know me have
probably heard me say: "I love pets - I'm just glad somebody else has them and
not me!" At the same time, it riles me when I see an animal treated cruelly. Neither
do my feelings about this matter mean that you shouldn't have pets - that's your
right and I have no quarrel with that. And so with that disclaimer behind us,
let me proceed to the gist of the matter.
I read the other day where one activist said, "an ant is every bit as important
as a man, and has as much right to life as a man." I wonder if she would want
to sleep with a bed full of them? Or, what about the poor fellow in the news who
had several thousand old tires on his property which the county told him he had
to get rid of? But wait - those tires were the breeding grounds for rats and mosquitoes,
and sos the animal rights folks were on his case. Poor guy - couldn't win! Then
we've got to shut down the logging industry in some western states because some
owls live in some old trees in the neighborhood. Any self-respecting owl would
simply move to another place if somebody cut down his tree! But after all, he
is just as important as any creature - human or otherwise.
In Genesis 1:26 God said: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:
and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the
air, and over the cattle, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the
earth." From this it is clear that man is more than a mere animal; God gave him
dominion over the animal creation. In no way did God ever intend that animals
be equal with man. Further note that it was man that was made in the image of
God. God created the animals, but there were made in his image. Neither is it
said that God, upon creating them, "breathed into his nostrils the breath of life"
(Gen. 2:7), thus endowing them with a soul. Man then possesses a life apart and
different from animals.
A look at Genesis 2:19-20 will also clearly show that man has been placed in
a superior position to the animal kingdom. Animals are interesting (nature films
on the Discovery Channel are some of my favorites!) - but never were they the
equal of man.
Following the great flood God said to Noah, "and the fear of you and the dread
of the beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth
upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hands are they delivered"
(Gen. 9:2). The important thing here is that the animals were delivered into the
mand of man; they were not his equal, nor were they as "important."
In Exodus 22:1, as well as many other passages in the Old Testament, animals
were clearly shown to be the property of man; he owned them. In Exodus 21:28 God
refers to the "owner" of the ox; the ox did not have "equal rights" with the man.
Should that ox gore a man to , the ox was to be killed. And there we have
a case for the "animal rights" folks to join hands with those opposed to capital
punishment!
I hesitate to write on this subject; the entire matter is a mass of ridiculous
rantings of a segment of society that are humanist to the core, and don't want
anything to do with God anyway. Therefore, to escape responsibility to that God,
they make man no more than an animal. Or, probably more correct, they elevate
animals to the level of man.
Seems like everybody has a "cause" these days, but this one almost takes the
provergial "cake." - Bill Moseley
AND ANOTHER THING
(Well - That Makes Sense)
The fellow driving through the country stopped to let his dog out of the car
(for whatever reason you let dogs out of cars while trraveling). Said dog spied
some sheep in a farmer's field, and being egged on by his adventuresome owner,
decided to chase and harass a few of the them. Problem? The field was encircled
with an electric fense, giving the unfortunate pooch the shock of his life. After
retrieving the howling canine, the owner looked the farmer up - "angry" would
be putting his disposition mildly! He yelled at the old farmer, "why don't you
put up a sign saying that fence was electrified?" Farmer counterd, "wal, mister
- I would of if I had knowed your dog could read."
Which ought to prompt all of us to wonder - have you ever "run off at the mouth"
and then had no answer when the other guy comes back with a perfectly logical
reply for why he did or didn't do a thing? Yeah, I guess its happened to all of
us. But it just seems like that's a hard lesson for some folks to learn - and
sometimes we don't even have the good sense to be embarrassed by our quick reply!
The moral seems to be that we need to stop and think before we "jump the gun"
and decide to tell somebody off. There may be (and probably is) a perfectly good
reason they did what they did or didn't do. If we don't get ourselves in trouble,
maybe our dogs will do it for us! - Bill Moseley |