In 2001
America
, we are forced to live in the midst of a "politically correct" society. Most
of it may be "politically correct," but when you hear that term you may rest assured
that it is not "sensibly correct." There is a group of whining loonies running
around among us that want to dictate how everybody else should run their lives,
from the government on down to the individual. If you are into the current news
media stream today, you have heard a lot about "reparations for slavery." What
is it all about, anyway?
Well, here we go. What these people want is first of all, apologies from our
government for slavery, and then monetary compensation for those who are descendants
of slaves. Let me say first, that slavery was an abhorrent, cruel and wrong institution.
No man with any sense of compassion for his fellow man, regardless of his color
or background would defend slavery.
But the movement has now moved into religious circles as well. In an article
in Christianity Today, posted
5-10-01
is the headline: "The General Board of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
has apologized for not doing enough in the 19th century to oppose slavery." The
article goes on to say, "Another possibility would be a church request that the
U. S.
government 'issue a national apology for participating in and supporting the
kidnapping, exporting and enslaving [of] people of African descent'."
This is arrogance of the greatest degree. Who put these folks in the business
of apologizing for the rest of us? A few questions may be in order. Do you own
any slaves? do I own any? do you know of anybody else who does? I for one refuse
to plead guilty to something that happened 200 years before I was born! There
is not a single American living today who was involved in the heinous institution
of slavery!
Concerning "reparations," or monetary payments to descendants of slaves, who
is going to decide how much it shall be? And if Uncle Sam gets involved in it,
you can bet that it will be a tax of some sort that will affect every American
in one way or another. And what about the millions of Americans whose descendants
came here
after slavery was abolished? Should
they be responsible for such payments? If so, why? It was not
their forefathers who owned slaves!
Why is it that we are never told that those who trafficked in slavery in the
18th and 19th centuries did so because the slaves they owned were sold by their
own people? And yet to an apologetic group of people who make a career out of
absurdity, the thought never seems to come that if this were carried to the extreme,
you would have reparations being paid to a group in our society by their own people!
This whole situation is the product of a group of people in society who want
to advise everybody else how to live and be the deciders of what and who is right
or wrong. Then if folks don’t go along with their decisions, they are “not compassionate”
or are “uncaring.”
The principle that God laid down is clear and simple: "The fathers shall not
be put to for the children, neither shall the children be put to for the fathers:
every man shall be put to for his own sin" (Deut. 24:16). In this movement we
have another example of everybody being a "victim;" i.e. the descendants of slaves
are "victims," and therefore are entitled to repayment by the rest of us whether
we had anything to do with the enslavement of their ancestors or not, Along with
the idea of the victimization of folks comes that of individual responsibility.
Anybody who owned slaves when that institution flourished will have to answer
to God for it; he will deal with it - it is not the fault of those living today.
There is yet another side to the matter. Even if I were a descendant of slaves,
it would be an affront to me for some group to decide whether or not I should
be repaid for what the ancestors of my contemporaries did! I could make that decision
for myself and hopefully would have sense enough to reason, "Why should I be paid
by folks now living because their ancestors did something bad to my ancestors?
What did my neighbor who happens to be white have to do with it?”
Yes, even churches today have gotten into the "politically correct" scene. But
we should not be surprised. Most churches have become so secularized that their
focus is on this and not on religious matters.
It occurs to me that if these folks were consistent, they ought to call every
Jew in the world today in question, because, after all, it was their ancestors
who crucified Christ! Also, should we hunt up every ancestor of the Romans who
actually crucified Christ and make them pay "reparations" to the Jews? After
all, Jesus was a Jew too! But as in most situations like this, consistency is
not a premium - it must give place to the god of "political correctness " Truly,
the legs of the lame are not equal. -
Bill Moseley